Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | 55th Kirk Schmaltz XC Invite | 55th Kirk Schmaltz XC Invite JV Girls | 22 | 23:21.70 | 1481 | 1481 |
| 2023-09-07 | Cedar Rapids Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 28 | 23:21.95 | 1369 | 1383 |
| 2023-09-12 | 49th Tom Karpan XC Invite | 49th Tom Karpan XC Invite JV girls | 40 | 24:53.40 | 1359 | 1379 |
| 2023-09-28 | Bud Williams Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 41 | 23:34.89 | 1364 | 1370 |
| 2023-10-05 | Fort Dodge Invite | Womens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 122 | 23:33.29 | 1347 | 1358 |
| 2023-10-11 | CIML Conference | Womens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 42 | 23:17.70 | 1344 | 1352 |
| 2024-09-05 | 2024 Ames - Schmaltz XC Invite | Ames - Kirk Schmaltz Invitational JV Girls | 35 | 23:02.40 | 1406 | 1403 |
| 2024-09-12 | Cedar Rapids Invitational | JV Girls 5K | 28 | 24:00.29 | 1369 | 1383 |
| 2024-09-17 | 50th Tom Karpen XC Invite | 50th Tom Karpen XC Invite 3 - JV girls | 36 | 25:34 | 1372 | 1378 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.