Elliot Liesland's Race Results

Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.

Event Date Event Name Race Name Finishing Place Finishing Time Performance Score Updated Rating
2023-08-28 55th Kirk Schmaltz XC Invite 55th Kirk Schmaltz XC Invite JV Boys 17 18:24.90 1886 1879
2023-09-07 50th Bobcat XC Invitational 50th Bobcat XC Invitational JV Boys 18 17:36.70 2004 1958
2023-09-12 49th Tom Karpan XC Invite 49th Tom Karpan XC Invite Varsity boys 26 18:33.70 1955 1956
2023-10-05 Fort Dodge Invite Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity 132 17:40 2029 2006
2024-09-05 2024 Ames - Schmaltz XC Invite Ames - Kirk Schmaltz Invitational Varsity Boys 64 17:34.90 2060 2057
2024-09-12 51st Marshalltown Bobcat xc Invite 51st Marshalltown Bobcat xc Invite Varsity boys 100 17:17.59 2106 2086
2024-09-20 Roy Griak Invitational Boys' Championship 5k 370 19:41 1998 2040
2024-10-05 Dan Huston/Steve Johnson Invitational Boys JV 5000M 148 20:35.20 1703 1809
2024-10-10 Ft Dodge Cross Country Invite Fort Dodge Cross Country Invite JV boys 91 18:57.59 1902 1892
2024-10-15 CIML Conference XC CIML Conference Cross Country Boys JV 5 km 24 18:19.29 1992 1949

Performance Trends Over Time

Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.

Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.