Keegan Ayers's Race Results

Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.

Event Date Event Name Race Name Finishing Place Finishing Time Performance Score Updated Rating
2023-09-21 Jim Boughton XC Mens 5,000 Meters Fresh/Soph Boys 51 19:37.40 1746 1752
2023-09-30 Steve Johnson Invitational Mens 5,000 Meters Boys JV 5000M 88 20:34.40 1751 1725
2023-10-05 Jim Hetrick Invitational (Central DeWitt) Mens 5,000 Meters Boys Freshmen/Sophmore 5K 18 20:17.59 1741 1757
2023-10-12 2023 MAC XC Conference Championships FreshSoph Boys 20 19:46.90 1722 1716
2024-09-03 2024 Clinton Schoolhouse Open Varsity Boys 43 20:11.09 1764 1762
2024-09-07 2024 Spartan Challenge Fresh-Soph Male 93 19:59 1741 1750
2024-09-12 Cedar Rapids Invitational Fr-So Boys 5K 28 19:48.79 1756 1753
2024-09-17 North Scott Lancer XC JV Boys 13 20:01.20 1765 1758
2024-09-26 Jim Boughton XC Fresh/Soph Boys 39 19:40.70 1746 1752
2024-10-01 Iowa City West Invitational JV Boys 29 19:26.79 1802 1773
2024-10-10 Jim Hetrick Invitational (Central DeWitt) Boys Freshmen/Sophmore 5K 18 19:49.79 1741 1757
2024-10-16 Mississippi Athletic Conference Meet Boys Fresh/Soph 5K 21 19:12.5 1777 1766

Performance Trends Over Time

Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.

Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.