Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | 50th Bobcat XC Invitational | 50th Bobcat XC Invitational JV Girls | 223 | 32:48.29 | 780 | 792 |
| 2023-09-12 | 49th Tom Karpan XC Invite | 49th Tom Karpan XC Invite JV girls | 165 | 33:04.40 | 806 | 800 |
| 2023-09-26 | Knoxville invitational 2023 | Varsity Girls 5000 Meter Run Finals | 76 | 33:10.52 | 704 | 744 |
| 2023-10-11 | CIML Conference | Womens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 153 | 29:32.59 | 855 | 820 |
| 2024-09-05 | 2024 Ames - Schmaltz XC Invite | Ames - Kirk Schmaltz Invitational JV Girls | 215 | 30:09.70 | 836 | 835 |
| 2024-09-12 | 51st Marshalltown Bobcat xc Invite | 51st Marshalltown Bobcat xc Invite JV girls | 206 | 30:26.5 | 842 | 839 |
| 2024-09-17 | 50th Tom Karpen XC Invite | 50th Tom Karpen XC Invite 3 - JV girls | 146 | 31:46.20 | 957 | 889 |
| 2024-10-01 | Knoxville Invitational | HS Girls | 69 | 31:32 | 881 | 884 |
| 2024-10-15 | CIML Conference XC | CIML Conference Cross Country Girls JV 5 km | 138 | 30:45.40 | 794 | 829 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.