Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | Johnston xc Invite | Johnston XC Invite Girls | 16 | 20:30.70 | 1666 | 1663 |
| 2023-09-02 | Abraham Lincoln Lynx CC Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 3 | 21:54.09 | 1756 | 1718 |
| 2023-09-07 | 50th Bobcat XC Invitational | 50th Bobcat XC Invitational Varsity Girls | 50 | 20:18.79 | 1682 | 1698 |
| 2023-09-28 | Southeast Polk XC meet | Southeast Polk CC Invitational 3 - Varsity Girls | 40 | 21:10.09 | 1654 | 1669 |
| 2023-10-05 | Fort Dodge Invite | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 85 | 20:20.79 | 1637 | 1652 |
| 2023-10-11 | CIML Conference | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 61 | 20:45.70 | 1574 | 1617 |
| 2023-10-18 | Iowa State Qualifier - 4A - Southeast Polk | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 28 | 21:40.79 | 1562 | 1588 |
| 2024-09-12 | 51st Marshalltown Bobcat xc Invite | 51st Marshalltown Bobcat xc Invite JV girls | 45 | 22:42.40 | 1427 | 1432 |
| 2024-10-15 | CIML Conference XC | CIML Conference Cross Country Girls JV 5 km | 49 | 24:18.09 | 1294 | 1319 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.