Zoe Mednick's Race Results

Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.

Event Date Event Name Race Name Finishing Place Finishing Time Performance Score Updated Rating
2023-08-26 Johnston xc Invite Johnston XC Invite Girls 130 28:26.90 1197 1202
2023-09-07 50th Bobcat XC Invitational 50th Bobcat XC Invitational 9-10 Girls 130 27:44.5 1271 1247
2023-09-28 Southeast Polk XC meet Southeast Polk CC Invitational 1 - JV Girls 166 27:53 1321 1298
2023-10-11 CIML Conference Womens 5,000 Meters Frosh/Soph 77 25:23.29 1500 1484
2024-08-31 Dragon Sunrise XC Invite Dragon Sunrise XC Invitational 71 25:24.79 1533 1527
2024-09-05 2024 Ames - Schmaltz XC Invite Ames - Kirk Schmaltz Invitational JV Girls 72 24:31.20 1513 1520
2024-09-17 50th Tom Karpen XC Invite 50th Tom Karpen XC Invite 3 - JV girls 81 27:49.20 1441 1475
2024-10-03 Southeast Polk CC Invitational Southeast Polk CC Invitational JV girls 135 27:05.79 1415 1436
2024-10-10 Ft Dodge Cross Country Invite Fort Dodge Cross Country Invite JV girls 179 25:02 1492 1467
2024-10-15 CIML Conference XC CIML Conference Cross Country Girls 9/10 5 km 76 24:53.29 1500 1484

Performance Trends Over Time

Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.

Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.