Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | Anamosa August XC Meet | Girls 5k | 87 | 24:53.69 | 1254 | 1258 |
| 2023-09-07 | Cedar Rapids Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Frosh/Soph | 59 | 26:46.66 | 1196 | 1188 |
| 2023-09-21 | Eastern Iowa Classic | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 59 | 25:56 | 1140 | 1143 |
| 2023-09-28 | Western Dubuque Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 39 | 26:53.90 | 1193 | 1171 |
| 2023-10-05 | MVC Super Meet | Womens 5,000 Meters Fr-So Girls | 75 | 27:12.40 | 1104 | 1136 |
| 2023-10-12 | 2023 MVC Valley Divisional Meet | Womens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 56 | 24:53.69 | 1197 | 1169 |
| 2024-08-31 | Anamosa August XC | Varsity Girls 5k | 90 | 29:28.90 | 1130 | 1132 |
| 2024-09-07 | 2024 Linn-Mar Invitational | Girls 5K | 92 | 25:35.29 | 1210 | 1178 |
| 2024-09-12 | Cedar Rapids Invitational | JV Girls 5K | 78 | 25:57.79 | 1196 | 1188 |
| 2024-09-19 | 39th Rich Engel Classic CC | 39th Rich Engel Classic CC Varsity Girls | 90 | 27:01.59 | 1241 | 1213 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.