Katiya Ellermeier's Race Results

Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.

Event Date Event Name Race Name Finishing Place Finishing Time Performance Score Updated Rating
2023-08-29 Hillcrest Academy Invitational 2023 JV Girls 5000 Meter Run Finals 9 24:36.95 1739 1735
2023-09-02 Pleasant Valley Spartan Classic Womens 5,000 Meters Frosh/Soph 40 23:43 1661 1693
2023-09-09 All-American Invitational Womens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity 4 21:31.79 1879 1782
2023-09-16 Heartland XC Classic Womens 5,000 Meters Frosh/Soph 24 23:53.29 1631 1683
2023-09-21 Jim Boughton XC Womens 5,000 Meters Fresh/Soph Girls 3 21:26.79 1669 1616
2024-09-14 Luther All-American Invitational Lynch-Dobyns All-American Race Girls Junior Varsity 5k (Junior Varsity) 67 24:29.5 1572 1576
2024-09-21 19th Heartland Classic 19th Heartland Classic 9-10-JV girls 97 24:53.59 1572 1574
2024-09-26 Jim Boughton XC JV Girls 23 23:07.5 1669 1616
2024-10-03 Bud Williams Invitational Girls JV 5000M 59 24:30.5 1583 1597
2024-10-10 MVC Super Meet JV Girls 5K 14 22:39.09 1703 1651
2024-10-17 MVC Valley Divisional Girls Fr-So & JV JV 7 22:31.59 1650 1650

Performance Trends Over Time

Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.

Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.