Kiera Aberson's Race Results

Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.

Event Date Event Name Race Name Finishing Place Finishing Time Performance Score Updated Rating
2024-08-30 Deb Hankins XC Meet Girls 5000m Varsity High School 31 28:58.59 1117 1123
2024-09-10 Sibley XC Invite Girls 5000m Varsity 45 28:36.17 1146 1137
2024-09-14 Tim Thomas Classic Girls 5000m High School Class B 81 26:40.45 1193 1163
2024-09-17 2024 Chris Smith Invitational Varsity Girls 38 28:20.29 1160 1161
2024-09-21 19th Heartland Classic 19th Heartland Classic Varsity girls 122 28:40 1019 1119
2024-09-23 HMS Invitational HS Girls 24 27:07.19 1173 1143
2024-09-30 Alta-Aurelia XC Meet Girls 5000m High School 42 26:52.07 1188 1165
2024-10-05 PAC XC Meet Girls 5000m High School 38 24:46.19 1216 1187
2024-10-08 Brian Knapp SCC CC Invite HS Girls 47 26:21.73 1146 1171
2024-10-17 Twin Lakes XC Championship Girls Varsity 5K 33 26:06.29 1183 1177
2024-10-24 Iowa Class 1A State Qualifier Girls 5000m High School 35 25:15.75 1238 1206
2024-11-02 1A Iowa High School Cross Country Championships Class 1A Girls 5000M 147 25:29.79 1148 1175

Performance Trends Over Time

Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.

Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.