Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-02 | Pella Dutch XC Invite | Pella Dutch XC Invite Boys | 177 | 23:09.09 | 1506 | 1506 |
| 2023-09-05 | Grinnell Invitational | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys | 102 | 25:26.70 | 1347 | 1416 |
| 2023-09-11 | 43rd Mike Carr Invitational | 43rd Mike Carr Invitational XC Meet JV Boys | 185 | 22:41.09 | 1518 | 1485 |
| 2023-09-16 | Heartland XC Classic | Mens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 159 | 21:35.09 | 1596 | 1535 |
| 2023-09-26 | Williamsburg September 2023 | Mens 5,000 Meters Boys Junior Varsity 5K | 89 | 21:45.90 | 1544 | 1540 |
| 2023-10-02 | Hillcrest Invitational 2023 | JV Boys 5000 Meter Run Finals | 30 | 23:26.16 | 1534 | 1537 |
| 2023-10-09 | Little Hawkeye Conference XC | Little Hawkeye Conference XC Championship 2 - JV Boys | 80 | 21:12.90 | 1575 | 1555 |
| 2024-09-07 | 2024 Pella HS XC Invite | Pella - Dutch XC Invitational Boys | 124 | 21:32.70 | 1588 | 1587 |
| 2024-09-12 | Gilbert CC Invite | Boys 5k Junior Varsity | 71 | 20:41.20 | 1642 | 1617 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.