Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | Clinton Schoolhouse Open 2023 | Varsity Boys 5000 Meter Run Finals | 19 | 19:23.90 | 1887 | 1881 |
| 2023-09-02 | Pleasant Valley Spartan Classic | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 66 | 18:34 | 1923 | 1904 |
| 2023-09-07 | Cedar Rapids Invitational | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 64 | 17:47.46 | 1933 | 1917 |
| 2023-09-12 | North Scott XC | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys | 14 | 18:09.70 | 1942 | 1928 |
| 2023-09-21 | Jim Boughton XC | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys | 55 | 17:30.20 | 1975 | 1951 |
| 2023-09-30 | Steve Johnson Invitational | Mens 5,000 Meters Boys Varsity Orange 5000M | 159 | 18:28.59 | 1997 | 1975 |
| 2023-10-05 | Jim Hetrick Invitational (Central DeWitt) | Mens 5,000 Meters Boys Varsity 5K | 31 | 18:06.90 | 1970 | 1973 |
| 2023-10-12 | 2023 MAC XC Conference Championships | Varsity Boys | 18 | 17:55.5 | 2057 | 2010 |
| 2023-10-18 | Iowa State Qualifier - 4A - Iowa City, West | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 30 | 17:22 | 2007 | 2009 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.