Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-23 | Anamosa XC | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys | 64 | 20:45.29 | 1712 | 1708 |
| 2023-09-26 | Jesup Invitational | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys 5K | 81 | 19:51.79 | 1744 | 1727 |
| 2023-10-03 | West Delaware Hawks XC | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys | 112 | 20:23.70 | 1685 | 1707 |
| 2023-10-07 | North Linn Invitational XC Meet | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys | 85 | 19:40.90 | 1701 | 1704 |
| 2023-10-10 | Tri-Rivers Conference XC Meet @ Little Bear Country Club | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys | 51 | 21:35.29 | 1572 | 1666 |
| 2023-10-19 | Iowa State Qualifier - 1A - North Linn | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 56 | 19:47.90 | 1677 | 1673 |
| 2023-10-27 | Iowa State Class 1A Championships | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 140 | 19:49.20 | 1750 | 1712 |
| 2024-09-10 | Clayton Ridge CC | Men 5k Run | 8 | 18:36.70 | 2006 | 2000 |
| 2024-09-14 | Monticello XC | Varsity Boys | 45 | 18:32 | 1940 | 1966 |
| 2024-09-19 | Cascade Invitational | Boys 5K | 34 | 19:32.20 | 1968 | 1967 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.