Claire KETTMANN's Race Results

Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.

Event Date Event Name Race Name Finishing Place Finishing Time Performance Score Updated Rating
2023-09-01 Corridor XC Clash-High School Womens 5,000 Meters Girls 5K 40 36:34.59 597 612
2023-09-09 Benton Invitational Womens 5,000 Meters HS Girls 73 33:52.20 660 642
2023-09-18 Solon Invitational Womens 5,000 Meters JV Girls 94 33:30.29 727 690
2023-09-25 Clipper CC Classic Womens 5,000 Meters Girls 5K 77 34:29.80 745 720
2023-10-03 West Delaware Hawks XC Womens 5,000 Meters JV Girls 147 33:38.40 544 567
2023-10-12 2023 MVC Mississippi Divisional XC Meet @ Dubuque Soccer Complex Womens 5,000 Meters JV Girls 58 31:28.70 760 728
2024-08-31 Cedar Rapids Prairie Invitational JV Girls 5K 70 37:50.69 564 568
2024-09-07 2024 Linn-Mar Invitational Girls 5K 159 33:27.70 660 625
2024-09-30 Clear Creek-Amana Invitational Girls 5K 81 37:43.59 585 595
2024-10-08 West Delaware Hawks XC JV Girls 122 33:05 544 567
2024-10-10 MVC Super Meet JV Girls 5K 114 33:38.79 601 582
2024-10-17 MVC Mississippi Divisional Fr-So & JV JV Girls 58 31:47.40 617 598

Performance Trends Over Time

Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.

Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.