Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | Glenwood Invite | Boys 5000m Varsity | 58 | 21:15.35 | 1704 | 1701 |
| 2024-09-03 | 2024 DC-G Invitational XC | Dallas Center-Grimes Cross Country Boys 5 km | 114 | 21:34 | 1698 | 1699 |
| 2024-09-10 | Clarinda Invite 2024 | Boys 5k Run | 34 | 22:19.79 | 1753 | 1725 |
| 2024-09-16 | 44th Mike Carr CC Invite | 44th Mike Carr CC Invite Class A-B boys | 99 | 21:28.40 | 1695 | 1710 |
| 2024-09-19 | Panorama CC Invite | Boys 5k Varsity | 69 | 22:39.5 | 1637 | 1683 |
| 2024-09-24 | 48th Steve McDermott Cardinal CC Invite | 48th Steve McDermott Cardinal CC Invite Varsity boys | 55 | 21:23 | 1631 | 1659 |
| 2024-09-28 | Cyclone Invite | Boys 5000m Junior Varsity | 10 | 20:14.94 | 1780 | 1707 |
| 2024-10-03 | Shenandoah CC Invite | Varsity Boys | 77 | 21:00.84 | 1696 | 1701 |
| 2024-10-10 | Trojan XC Invitational | JV Boys | 28 | 20:58.5 | 1748 | 1725 |
| 2024-10-17 | H-10 Conference Meet | Boys 5k JUNIOR VARSITY | 24 | 21:31.93 | 1603 | 1665 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.