Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-05 | South Hardin XC | Varsity Girls | 17 | 24:31.79 | 1862 | 1856 |
| 2024-09-10 | Dick Pollitt Classic (Waverly-Shell Rock) | Girls 9th/10th 5K | 14 | 22:33.70 | 1809 | 1829 |
| 2024-09-16 | South Tama County CC Invitational | Varsity Girls | 13 | 23:36 | 1762 | 1796 |
| 2024-09-19 | 39th Rich Engel Classic CC | 39th Rich Engel Classic CC Varsity Girls | 64 | 24:32.5 | 1676 | 1751 |
| 2024-09-26 | Sam Iverson Invitational (Grundy Center) | Girls High School 5K | 26 | 23:14.59 | 1786 | 1771 |
| 2024-10-01 | Jesup Invitational | Varsity Girls 5K | 49 | 22:15.79 | 1744 | 1757 |
| 2024-10-08 | Dike New-Hartford Invitational | Varsity Girls 5K | 48 | 22:16.5 | 1750 | 1754 |
| 2024-10-12 | Bob Mudd Lynx Invitational | Varsity Girls | 58 | 22:51.40 | 1681 | 1724 |
| 2024-10-17 | North Iowa Cedar League Conference Meet | Girls Varsity 5K | 32 | 22:00.09 | 1755 | 1739 |
| 2024-10-24 | Iowa 2A SQM @ Pella | Girls 5000m | 28 | 22:34.59 | 1759 | 1748 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.