Miriam Riggert's Race Results

Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.

Event Date Event Name Race Name Finishing Place Finishing Time Performance Score Updated Rating
2024-08-30 Deb Hankins XC Meet Girls 5000m Junior Varsity High School 1 22:52.60 1576 1575
2024-09-05 Spirit Lake/Okoboji XC Meet Girls 5000m Varsity 40 23:06.81 1516 1541
2024-09-14 Tim Thomas Classic Girls 5000m High School Class A 31 23:07.98 1494 1515
2024-09-17 Storm Lake XC Meet Girls 5000m Varsity 41 24:11.56 1419 1477
2024-09-21 Ottumwa Invitational Twilight Cross Country Meet Ottumwa Invitational Twilight Cross Country Meet Girls 5 km 20 23:28.90 1445 1461
2024-09-26 Sioux Center XC Invite Girls 5000m Varsity 68 24:22.96 1375 1425
2024-09-30 Alta-Aurelia XC Meet Girls 5000m High School 17 23:20.88 1457 1440
2024-10-08 Cherokee XC Meet Girls 5000m Varsity 30 22:36.57 1499 1470
2024-10-14 Lakes Conference XC Meet Girls 5000m 17 23:21.47 1382 1426
2024-10-24 Iowa Class 2A State Qualifier Girls 5000m 39 23:33.96 1392 1406
2024-11-02 2A Iowa High School Cross Country Championships Class 2A Girls 5000M 122 22:43.79 1387 1396

Performance Trends Over Time

Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.

Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.