Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | Williamsburg Invitational | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 29 | 19:33.79 | 1733 | 1729 |
| 2023-09-05 | Grinnell Invitational | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys | 24 | 18:47.90 | 1837 | 1793 |
| 2023-09-11 | South Tama Invitational | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys | 13 | 18:02.90 | 1905 | 1853 |
| 2023-09-26 | Williamsburg September 2023 | Mens 5,000 Meters Boys Varsity 5K | 35 | 17:50.40 | 1928 | 1902 |
| 2023-09-30 | Steve Johnson Invitational | Mens 5,000 Meters Boys Varsity Orange 5000M | 138 | 18:14 | 1905 | 1904 |
| 2023-10-05 | Montezuma Invitational XC Meet | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity Boys | 8 | 18:39.5 | 1776 | 1851 |
| 2023-10-12 | WaMaC Conference | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 22 | 17:43.29 | 1958 | 1912 |
| 2023-10-18 | Iowa State Qualifier - 3A - Clear Lake | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 18 | 17:35.40 | 1984 | 1949 |
| 2023-10-28 | Iowa State Class 3A Championships | Mens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 73 | 17:15.09 | 2010 | 1982 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.