Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | Heelan XC Invite 2023 | Mens 2.1 Miles Junior Varsity | 58 | 16:59.10 | 1405 | 1406 |
| 2023-08-29 | Boyden Hull Night Hawk 2023 | JV Boys 5000 Meter Run Finals | 23 | 23:46.09 | 1534 | 1480 |
| 2023-09-05 | Gary Meyer Memorial | Mens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 108 | 23:58.72 | 1497 | 1491 |
| 2023-09-09 | Tim Thomas XC Classic 2023 | 1A Boys 5000 Meter Run Finals | 61 | 22:42.46 | 1563 | 1523 |
| 2023-09-12 | Woodbury Central XC Invitational 2023 | JV Boys 5000 Meter Run Finals | 24 | 24:10.59 | 1509 | 1517 |
| 2024-08-30 | SC Heelan XC Meet JV | Boys 2.1 Mile Run JV | 7 | 14:17.87 | 1815 | 1809 |
| 2024-09-03 | 2024 BHRV | Boys 5000m Junior Varsity JV | 11 | 22:10.57 | 1666 | 1720 |
| 2024-09-10 | Lemars XC Invite | Boys 5000m JV | 74 | 23:55.55 | 1594 | 1646 |
| 2024-09-14 | Tim Thomas Classic | Boys 5000m High School Class A | 100 | 20:53.00 | 1718 | 1687 |
| 2024-09-17 | Woodbury Central XC Meet | Boys 5000m Varsity & JV | 32 | 21:40.33 | 1721 | 1704 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.