Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-05 | Madrid CC Invite | Girls 5k High School | 24 | 27:24.70 | 1125 | 1131 |
| 2024-09-12 | Colfax-Mingo CC Invite | Girls 5k High School | 28 | 26:33.09 | 1179 | 1160 |
| 2024-09-16 | South Tama County CC Invitational | Varsity Girls | 50 | 29:03 | 1077 | 1122 |
| 2024-09-19 | Colo CC Invite | Girls 5k HIGH SCHOOL | 22 | 29:32.5 | 1157 | 1138 |
| 2024-09-24 | West Marshall CC Invite | Girls 5k High School | 28 | 26:33.04 | 1235 | 1177 |
| 2024-09-30 | Nevada Cubs | Varsity Girls | 67 | 30:07.40 | 952 | 1094 |
| 2024-10-05 | South Hardin Invitational | Girls Varsity/JV 5K | 14 | 26:37 | 1197 | 1161 |
| 2024-10-08 | Dike New-Hartford Invitational | Varsity Girls 5K | 100 | 24:12.70 | 1258 | 1203 |
| 2024-10-10 | South Hamilton CC Invite | Girls 5k HIGH SCHOOL | 49 | 25:15.29 | 1229 | 1214 |
| 2024-10-17 | Iowa Star Conference | HS Girls | 20 | 23:24.5 | 1247 | 1230 |
| 2024-10-24 | ACGC 1A District Meet | Girls 5k Varsity | 43 | 25:39.5 | 1227 | 1228 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.