Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | Trojan Early Bird Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters JV Girls 5K | 33 | 27:19.59 | 1258 | 1262 |
| 2023-09-02 | Linn-Mar Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters HS Girls | 121 | 27:03.09 | 1163 | 1206 |
| 2023-09-07 | 50th Bobcat XC Invitational | 50th Bobcat XC Invitational 9-10 Girls | 106 | 26:23.79 | 1212 | 1209 |
| 2023-09-09 | All-American Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 142 | 26:44.40 | 1187 | 1200 |
| 2023-09-14 | Rich Engel Classic | Rich Engel Classic XC Meet JV girls | 76 | 26:30.90 | 1245 | 1219 |
| 2023-09-21 | Jim Boughton XC | Womens 5,000 Meters Fresh/Soph Girls | 39 | 25:06.20 | 1204 | 1212 |
| 2023-09-30 | Steve Johnson Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Girls JV 5000M | 79 | 28:09.09 | 1214 | 1213 |
| 2023-10-05 | MVC Super Meet | Womens 5,000 Meters Fr-So Girls | 81 | 27:40.09 | 1073 | 1161 |
| 2023-10-12 | 2023 MVC Valley Divisional Meet | Womens 5,000 Meters Junior Varsity | 64 | 25:33.13 | 1156 | 1158 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.