Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | BCLUW Comet Invite | Boys 5k Run High School | 37 | 23:33.96 | 1502 | 1502 |
| 2023-10-12 | Iowa Star Conference 2023 | Varsity Boys 5000 Meter Run Finals | 47 | 22:06 | 1444 | 1460 |
| 2024-09-03 | 2024 Williamsburg Raider Invitational | Varsity Boys 5K | 73 | 21:59.5 | 1601 | 1597 |
| 2024-09-10 | Springville Invitational | Boys 5k | 37 | 23:31 | 1526 | 1554 |
| 2024-09-19 | 39th Rich Engel Classic CC | 39th Rich Engel Classic CC 6 - Varsity Boys | 153 | 23:16.40 | 1534 | 1542 |
| 2024-09-26 | Sam Iverson Invitational (Grundy Center) | Boys High School 5K Varsity | 73 | 22:28 | 1553 | 1548 |
| 2024-10-05 | South Hardin Invitational | Boys Varsity/JV 5K | 43 | 24:04.40 | 1477 | 1513 |
| 2024-10-08 | South Winneshiek Invitational | Boys Varsity 5000M | 96 | 21:17.79 | 1519 | 1515 |
| 2024-10-17 | Iowa Star Conference | HS Boys | 37 | 20:47 | 1569 | 1542 |
| 2024-10-24 | North Linn 1A State Qualifier | Boys 5K | 72 | 21:19.79 | 1530 | 1536 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.