Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-30 | Steve Johnson Invitational | Mens 5,000 Meters Boys JV 5000M | 83 | 20:30.40 | 1762 | 1758 |
| 2023-10-10 | River Valley Conference XC Meet 2023 | Varsity Boys 5000 Meter Run Finals | 50 | 19:43 | 1758 | 1758 |
| 2024-09-03 | 2024 Williamsburg Raider Invitational | Varsity Boys 5K | 21 | 18:38.09 | 2008 | 2003 |
| 2024-09-14 | Monticello XC | Varsity Boys | 36 | 18:16.90 | 1998 | 2000 |
| 2024-09-24 | Mount Pleasant Cross Country | HS Boys | 28 | 18:07 | 2007 | 2003 |
| 2024-09-30 | Clear Creek-Amana Invitational | Boys 5K | 17 | 18:36.09 | 2011 | 2007 |
| 2024-10-05 | Dan Huston/Steve Johnson Invitational | Boys Varsity Gray 5000M | 113 | 18:02.70 | 2057 | 2028 |
| 2024-10-15 | River Valley XC | High School Boys | 15 | 18:13.70 | 2078 | 2054 |
| 2024-10-24 | Iowa 2A SQM @ Pella | Boys 5000m | 18 | 18:03.95 | 2054 | 2054 |
| 2024-11-02 | 2A Iowa High School Cross Country Championships | Class 2A Boys 5000M | 75 | 17:50.29 | 2115 | 2085 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.