Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-03 | 2024 Bellevue Twilight 4k | Boys 4k | 3 | 13:39 | 1895 | 1888 |
| 2024-09-12 | Northeast Cross Country Invitational | Boys 5000 Meter Run | 4 | 19:46.71 | 1935 | 1916 |
| 2024-09-16 | Midland XC | High School Boys | 4 | 19:29.59 | 1881 | 1900 |
| 2024-09-23 | Bellevue Invitational | Varsity Boys | 12 | 18:33.79 | 1841 | 1872 |
| 2024-09-26 | Jim Boughton XC | Fresh/Soph Boys | 19 | 18:53.29 | 1853 | 1864 |
| 2024-09-30 | Bill Bails Invitational (North Cedar) | Boys Varsity 5K | 9 | 19:07.29 | 1915 | 1884 |
| 2024-10-03 | Western Dubuque Invitational | Varsity Boys | 50 | 19:35.90 | 1847 | 1870 |
| 2024-10-07 | Marquette XC | High School Boys | 10 | 18:18.70 | 1844 | 1859 |
| 2024-10-10 | Jim Hetrick Invitational (Central DeWitt) | Boys Varsity 5K | 96 | 21:06.40 | 1593 | 1819 |
| 2024-10-15 | Tri-Rivers Conference | High School Boys | 21 | 18:41.09 | 1833 | 1827 |
| 2024-10-24 | IC Regina 1A State Qualifier | Boys 5K | 35 | 19:29.20 | 1817 | 1821 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.