Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-09-03 | 2024 Plattsmouth Invite | Boys 5000m Junior Varsity | 9 | 19:50.64 | 2089 | 2079 |
2024-09-07 | 55th Annual Abraham Lincoln HS CC Invite | Boys 5k | 21 | 20:39.71 | 1894 | 1952 |
2024-09-12 | Platte River Rumble-HS | Boys 5000m Large School Varsity | 157 | 19:33.81 | 1952 | 1952 |
2024-09-19 | Blair Invite | Boys 5000m Varsity | 12 | 19:37.51 | 1989 | 1973 |
2024-09-24 | 2024 Creighton Prep Bob Tillman, SJ XC Meet | HS Boys | 60 | 18:58.40 | 2020 | 1996 |
2024-09-28 | Cyclone Invite | Boys 5000m Varsity | 52 | 19:34.02 | 1903 | 1956 |
2024-10-01 | Monarch Invite | Boys 5000m Varsity | 36 | 18:53.90 | 1935 | 1946 |
2024-10-03 | Shenandoah CC Invite | Varsity Boys | 20 | 18:23.52 | 2032 | 1976 |
2024-10-10 | Trojan XC Invitational | Varsity Boys | 29 | 18:52.09 | 2067 | 2021 |
2024-10-17 | 2024 MRAC Cross Country Meet 2024 | Boys 5000 Meter Run Finals | 42 | 20:56.70 | 1796 | 1918 |
2024-10-23 | 4A SQM CB Lincoln | Varsity Boys | 48 | 19:23.90 | 1946 | 1938 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.