Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-03 | 2024 Williamsburg Raider Invitational | JV Boys 5K | 16 | 21:18.40 | 1685 | 1682 |
| 2024-09-10 | Van Buren XC Meet | Boys 5k | 25 | 19:11.29 | 1791 | 1747 |
| 2024-09-12 | Davis County CC Invite | Boys 5k High School | 20 | 21:37.50 | 1778 | 1764 |
| 2024-09-17 | Oskaloosa Invite - 2024 | HS Boys | 50 | 20:16.59 | 1817 | 1787 |
| 2024-09-21 | 19th Heartland Classic | 19th Heartland Classic 9-10-JV boys | 134 | 20:04.29 | 1777 | 1783 |
| 2024-09-23 | PCM CC Invite | Boys 5k High School | 24 | 20:10.09 | 1838 | 1802 |
| 2024-09-28 | Pekin Grade Race | HS Boys | 12 | 19:57.64 | 1782 | 1793 |
| 2024-10-03 | Charition CC Invite | Boys 5k High School | 9 | 19:30.77 | 1889 | 1830 |
| 2024-10-08 | Centerville Invite | Boys 5k HS Varsity | 41 | 18:33.5 | 1856 | 1844 |
| 2024-10-15 | SCC Conference Meet at Centerville | Boys 5k HIGH SCHOOL | 18 | 19:08.20 | 1898 | 1870 |
| 2024-10-24 | Iowa 2A SQM @ Pella | Boys 5000m | 36 | 19:13.19 | 1899 | 1885 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.