Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | Deb Hankins XC Meet | Girls 5000m Varsity High School | 35 | 32:04.46 | 834 | 845 |
| 2024-09-03 | 2024 Plattsmouth Invite | Girls 5000m Varsity | 52 | 36:27.63 | 847 | 846 |
| 2024-09-10 | Sibley XC Invite | Girls 5000m JV | 27 | 39:06.73 | 602 | 768 |
| 2024-09-14 | Tim Thomas Classic | Girls 5000m High School Class B | 126 | 31:56.75 | 867 | 830 |
| 2024-09-17 | 2024 Chris Smith Invitational | JV Girls | 13 | 34:33.17 | 705 | 762 |
| 2024-09-26 | MVAOCOU XC Meet | Girls 5000m High School | 69 | 31:29.64 | 857 | 827 |
| 2024-10-01 | Monarch Invite | Girls 5000m Varsity | 97 | 30:54.79 | 850 | 839 |
| 2024-10-08 | Kingsley-Pierson XC Invite | Girls 5000m | 42 | 31:45.81 | 844 | 842 |
| 2024-10-14 | OA-BCIG XC Meet | Girls 5000m High School | 60 | 28:01.56 | 967 | 891 |
| 2024-10-19 | Western Valley Conference XC Meet | Girls 5000m High School | 34 | 28:23.44 | 950 | 925 |
| 2024-10-24 | Iowa Class 2A State Qualifier | Girls 5000m | 72 | 27:12.69 | 1073 | 980 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.