Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-14 | Central Invitational 2023 | Varsity Boys 5000 Meter Run Finals | 56 | 23:55.59 | 1362 | 1364 |
| 2024-09-05 | MFLMM XC Invite | Boys 5k | 39 | 23:18.65 | 1571 | 1567 |
| 2024-09-10 | Clayton Ridge CC | Men 5k Run | 43 | 23:52.90 | 1479 | 1515 |
| 2024-09-14 | Luther All-American Invitational | Glessner-Livingood-Olson-Sandness All-American Race Boys Varsity 5k (Varsity) | 231 | 23:38.59 | 1395 | 1458 |
| 2024-09-24 | Waukon Invitational | Junior Varsity Boys 5K | 56 | 23:38.29 | 1406 | 1425 |
| 2024-10-01 | Jesup Invitational | JV Boys 5K | 67 | 22:04.09 | 1462 | 1445 |
| 2024-10-03 | LARPH Invitational | Boys 5k | 86 | 22:43.90 | 1544 | 1482 |
| 2024-10-08 | South Winneshiek Invitational | Boys Varsity 5000M | 105 | 22:20.20 | 1439 | 1460 |
| 2024-10-17 | Upper Iowa Conference Championships | Boys Varsity 5000M | 40 | 22:29.20 | 1428 | 1443 |
| 2024-10-24 | North Linn 1A State Qualifier | Boys 5K | 86 | 22:05.59 | 1435 | 1439 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.