Sophie Boemler's Race Results

Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.

Event Date Event Name Race Name Finishing Place Finishing Time Performance Score Updated Rating
2023-08-29 Oelwein Invitational Womens 5,000 Meters Girls Varsity 5K 28 22:42.29 1624 1622
2023-09-07 Bob Scott Invitational (North Fayette Valley) Womens 5,000 Meters Girls 5K 30 22:28 1573 1592
2023-09-12 Starmont Invitational Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity Girls 30 22:04.59 1575 1584
2023-09-18 Denver Invitational Womens 5,000 Meters Girls Varsity 5K 16 21:55.29 1596 1589
2023-09-21 Sam Iverson Invitational (Grundy Center) Womens 5,000 Meters Girls Varsity 5K 17 22:24.70 1558 1577
2023-09-30 Crestwood Invitational Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity 11 22:22.09 1578 1577
2023-10-03 Dike-New Hartford Invitational Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity Girls 18 21:17.90 1608 1589
2023-10-05 New Hampton Invitational Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity 16 21:21.40 1542 1573
2023-10-11 NICL Conference Meet Womens 5,000 Meters Girls Varsity 5K 19 20:51.70 1572 1573
2023-10-19 Iowa State Qualifier - 2A - Dike-New Hartford Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity 16 20:42.70 1597 1584

Performance Trends Over Time

Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.

Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.