Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | All-American Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 103 | 22:28.29 | 1735 | 1731 |
| 2023-09-12 | Green Devils Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 10 | 22:01.59 | 1861 | 1800 |
| 2023-09-14 | Independence Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Girls Varsity 5K | 12 | 21:12.70 | 1888 | 1847 |
| 2023-09-21 | Sam Iverson Invitational (Grundy Center) | Womens 5,000 Meters Girls Varsity 5K | 15 | 22:16 | 1859 | 1853 |
| 2023-09-26 | Jesup Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity Girls 5K | 23 | 21:32.70 | 1900 | 1874 |
| 2023-09-30 | Crestwood Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 12 | 22:25.20 | 1834 | 1857 |
| 2023-10-05 | New Hampton Invitational | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 13 | 20:59.59 | 1908 | 1879 |
| 2023-10-10 | Northeast Iowa Conference Championships | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 11 | 21:43.29 | 1861 | 1871 |
| 2023-10-19 | Iowa State Qualifier - 2A - Dike-New Hartford | Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity | 20 | 20:56.29 | 1879 | 1875 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.