Lydia Wehrspann's Race Results

Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.

Event Date Event Name Race Name Finishing Place Finishing Time Performance Score Updated Rating
2023-08-26 Anamosa August XC Meet Girls 5k 59 23:09.70 1352 1354
2023-08-31 South Hardin XC @ Pine Lake Country Club Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity Girls 62 27:16.59 1342 1347
2023-09-07 Bob Scott Invitational (North Fayette Valley) Womens 5,000 Meters Girls 5K 79 25:32.90 1325 1337
2023-09-14 Cascade Invitational 2023 Girls 5000 Meter Run Finals 61 26:13.5 1301 1320
2023-09-21 Sam Iverson Invitational (Grundy Center) Womens 5,000 Meters Girls Varsity 5K 53 25:01.40 1316 1318
2023-09-26 Jesup Invitational Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity Girls 5K 97 24:38.40 1286 1304
2023-10-03 West Delaware Hawks XC Womens 5,000 Meters Girls Varsity 90 25:00.09 1270 1289
2023-10-11 NICL Conference Meet Womens 5,000 Meters Girls Varsity 5K 65 23:40.40 1271 1280
2023-10-19 Iowa State Qualifier - 2A - Dike-New Hartford Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity 57 23:09.70 1345 1312
2023-10-28 Iowa State Class 2A Championships Womens 5,000 Meters Varsity 134 23:35.90 1331 1322

Performance Trends Over Time

Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.

Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.