Below you'll find a detailed table of race results. The "Performance Score" reflects the rating for that specific race, while the "Updated Rating" represents your cumulative rating, influenced by past performances. This distinction is key, as your overall rating is a weighted average that slowly responds to your most recent race's performance score. For a visual representation of how these ratings evolve, refer to the graph below.
| Event Date | Event Name | Race Name | Finishing Place | Finishing Time | Performance Score | Updated Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-05 | Trent Smith Invitational (Charles City) | Girls 11th/12th Grade 5K | 7 | 22:27.79 | 1577 | 1576 |
| 2024-09-12 | 2024 Bob Scott Invitational (North Fayette Valley) | Girls 5K | 12 | 22:28.40 | 1601 | 1590 |
| 2024-09-17 | Starmont Invitational | Girls Varsity 5K | 21 | 22:15.90 | 1597 | 1593 |
| 2024-09-24 | Waukon Invitational | Varsity Girls 5K | 11 | 21:41.09 | 1589 | 1591 |
| 2024-09-26 | Panther Invitational | Girls Varsity 5000M | 20 | 22:07.59 | 1573 | 1585 |
| 2024-10-03 | Western Dubuque Invitational | Varsity Girls | 24 | 22:39.29 | 1505 | 1552 |
| 2024-10-08 | South Winneshiek Invitational | Girls Varsity 5000M | 16 | 21:46.79 | 1492 | 1524 |
| 2024-10-15 | Northeast Iowa Conference | High School Girls | 12 | 21:46.00 | 1533 | 1529 |
| 2024-10-24 | 2A State Qualifier @ Monticello | High School Girls | 22 | 21:19 | 1503 | 1516 |
| 2024-11-02 | 2A Iowa High School Cross Country Championships | Class 2A Girls 5000M | 82 | 21:32.29 | 1537 | 1527 |
Explore the visual trends of performance scores and updated ratings across different events. This graphical representation helps in understanding the progression and fluctuations in performance over time.
Ratings are dynamic estimates, representing a range of potential future performance outcomes. The box plots above illustrate these ranges, with the red dotted line indicating the "Performance Score" and the solid blue line showing the "Updated Rating". A performance score falling outside the expected range can lead to significant adjustments in the updated rating, reflecting the dynamic nature of performance evaluation.